| 421 | 0 | 405 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
生成式AI的迅猛发展为社会创新提供了强大动力,但其固有的幻觉问题也容易引发多重社会风险,具体表现为社会认知扭曲、社会信任危机和社会心理失序。基于信息生态系统理论研究发现,AI幻觉的社会风险由信息技术、信息主体、信息内容与信息环境四个维度的交互作用共同导致,其生成过程遵循幻觉“孕育—触发—放大—社会风险生成”的逻辑链条,即信息技术缺陷与训练数据偏差孕育幻觉,信息主体不当提示与启发式判断触发幻觉,信息内容协同生产与递归反馈机制加剧幻觉的蔓延,最终在信息环境对信息主体的系统性形塑下,社会风险得以生成。为此,需要从技术、公民、内容与制度四个维度,协同构建AI幻觉的社会风险治理体系,推动智能社会朝着更加稳健、可信、可持续的方向发展。
Abstract:[1]中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划的建议[N].人民日报,2025-10-29(01).
[2]李烨.推动人工智能全方位赋能千行百业[N].人民日报(理论版),2025-11-03(09).
[3]梁昭.AI“幻觉”:认知困境、术语反思与范式嬗变[J].民族学刊,2025(8).
[4]当AI“一本正经胡说八道”……[EB/OL].(2025-09-25)[2025-10-08].http://www.banyuetan.org/kj/detail/20250925/1 000200033136211758763299009561545_1.html.
[5]刘嘉玲,魏江,肖咪咪.大模型如何助力医疗健康服务提质增效——以微脉CareAI的实践为例[J].清华管理评论,2025(3).
[6]喻国明,卞中明.大模型时代的信任重塑:小模型实现超级对齐的机制与模式[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2024(3).
[7]胡泳,王昱昊.技术过程论视角下AI幻觉生成的价值负荷与伦理问题探析[J].南京社会科学,2025(3).
[8]Ji Z,Lee N,Frieske R,et al.Survey of hallucination in natural language generation[J].ACM computing surveys,2023(12).
[9]林曦.人工智能“幻觉”的存在主义阐释[J].社会科学辑刊,2025(2).
[10]Cossio M.A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in large language models[J/OL].Computer Science,2025,https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01781.
[11]喻国明,金丽萍,苏芳.大模型幻觉的表现特征、效应争议及潜在价值[J].新闻与传播评论,2026(1).
[12]秦静,李菲,邓元兵.从“表征偏差”到“认知突围”:人工智能幻觉作为创造性认知的双重中介[J/OL].新媒体与社会,2025,https://link.cnki.net/urlid/CN.20250814.1714.008.
[13]Sood A K,Zeadally S,Hong E K.The Paradigm of Hallucinations in AI-driven cybersecurity systems:understanding taxonomy,classification outcomes,and mitigations[J].Computers and Electrical Engineering,2025,124.
[14]刘俣孜,赵云泽.人工智能幻觉现象的生成机制与治理策略研究[J/OL].新媒体与社会,2025,https://link.cnki.net/urlid/CN.20250806.1102.002.
[15]郑煌杰.从ChatGPT到DeepSeek:大模型幻觉的规制进路[J/OL].情报杂志,2025,https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1167.g3.20250909.1241.002.
[16]张铮,刘晨旭.大模型幻觉:人机传播中的认知风险与共治可能[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(5).
[17]Shao A.New sources of inaccuracy?A conceptual framework for studying AI hallucinations[J].Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review,2025(4).
[18]方俊,郭细喜.“认知-期待-赋权”三维视域下社会组织认同困境破解——以广州Z志愿服务队为研究样本[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2025(2).
[19]Weaver M.AI chatbots distort and mislead when asked about current affairs,BBC finds[EB/OL].(2025-02-11)[2025-10-10].https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/feb/11/ai-chatbots-distort-and-mislead-when-asked-about-current-affairs-bbc-finds?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
[20]马忠,高怡英.生成式大语言模型的社会认知风险与应对[J].浙江社会科学,2025(2).
[21]Pataranutaporn P,Archiwaranguprok C,Chan S W T,et al.Synthetic human memories:AI-edited images and videos can implant false memories and distort recollection[C]// Yamashita N,Evers V,Yatani K,et al.Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.New York:Association for Computing Machinery,2025.
[22]Clare O′Hagan.New UNESCO report warns that Generative AI threatens Holocaust memory[EB/OL].(2024-07-05)[2025-10-10].https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/new-unesco-report-warns-generative-ai-threatens-holocaust-memory?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
[23]郑永君.塑造数字时代的社会信任[EB/OL].(2025-09-17)[2025-10-12].https://www.cssn.cn/skgz/bwyc/202509/t2025 0917_5915438.shtml?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
[24]喻国明,金丽萍,刘佳颖.大语言模型下机器的幻觉与人机信任构建机制探讨[J].未来传播,2025(2).
[25]Zhu Y,Hua G,Liu X,et al.Trust in machines:how personality trait shapes static and dynamic trust across different human–machine interaction modalities[J].Frontiers in Psychology,2025,16.
[26]向安玲.无以信,何以立:人机交互中的可持续信任机制[J].未来传播,2024(2).
[27][德]尼克拉斯·卢曼.信任:一个社会复杂性的简化机制[M].瞿铁鹏,李强,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[28]张泽予,黄文旭.AI法律工具“幻觉”现象的实证研究——基于200余件实例的本土评测[J].新文科教育研究,2025(2).
[29]Magesh V,Surani F,Dahl M,et al.Hallucination‐Free?Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools[J].Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,2025(2).
[30]沈杰.吉登斯的社会心理思想——高度现代性境况下的自我认同问题[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2023(1).
[31]Hudon A,Stip E.Delusional Experiences Emerging From AI Chatbot Interactions or “AI Psychosis”[J].JMIR Mental Health,2025,12.
[32]Fieldhouse R.Can AI chatbots trigger psychosis?What the science says[J].Nature,2025,646.
[33]Dupré M H.People Are Becoming Obsessed with ChatGPT and Spiraling Into Severe Delusions[EB/OL].(2025-06-10)[2025-10-12].https://futurism.com/chatgpt-mental-health-crises.
[34]Osler L.Hallucinating with AI:AI Psychosis as Distributed Delusions[J/OL].Computer Science,2025,https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19588.
[35]马俊.人工智能幻觉,怎么破[N].环球时报,2025-06-13(08).
[36]郭全中,张磊,韦薇.AI幻觉的生成机理与敏捷治理[J].新闻爱好者,2026(2).
[37][美]凯特·克劳福德.技术之外:社会联结中的人工智能[M].丁宁,李红澄,方伟,译.北京:中国原子能出版社,2024.
[38]Huang L,Yu W,Ma W,et al.A survey on hallucination in large language models:principles,taxonomy,challenges,and open questions[J].ACM Transactions on Information Systems,2025(2).
[39]Dang H A,Tran V,Nguyen L M.Survey and analysis of hallucinations in large language models:attribution to prompting strategies or model behavior[J].Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence,2025,8.
[40]Liang K,Hu H,Zhao X,et al.Machine Bullshit:Characterizing the Emergent Disregard for Truth in Large Language Models[J/OL].Computer Science,2025,https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07484.
[41]杨颖,颜立,官永彬.不同社交媒体平台上口碑信息是如何影响购买意愿的?——解释水平和加工流畅性的中介作用[J].心理科学,2022(4).
[42]Bandara C.Hallucination as disinformation:the role of LLMs in amplifying conspiracy theories and fake news[J].Journal of Applied Cybersecurity Analytics,Intelligence,and Decision-Making Systems,2024(12).
[43]Shumailov I,Shumaylov Z,Zhao Y,et al.AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data[J].Nature,2024,631.
[44]王硕,张徐姗,李正风.多层视域下的AI for Science[J].自然辩证法研究,2025(9).
[45]雷文强.大模型在网络空间中的安全风险与治理对策[J].人民论坛,2025(16).
[46]Agirdag O.Beyond Prompt Engineering:Prompting (L) iteracy,Linguistic Capital,and Educational Inequality[J].Educational Theory,2026(2).
[47]Hwang Y,Lee J H,Shin D.What is prompt literacy?An exploratory study of language learners′ development of new literacy skill using generative AI[J/OL].Computer Science,2023,https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05373.
[48]李明,曹海军.信息生态视域下省级政府数据开放服务质量驱动机制研究——基于20省平台数据的组态分析[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2023(6).
基本信息:
中图分类号:B82-057;TP18
引用信息:
[1]胡健雄.AI幻觉的社会风险:现实样态、生成机理与治理进路[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2026,47(02):49-59.
基金信息:
广东海洋大学科研启动经费资助项目“数字行政负担的生成机理及其治理研究”(060302092409)阶段性成果
2026-02-10
2026-02-10