| 365 | 8 | 33 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文通过对中国古代和西方现代文学接受理论的比较分析 ,认为 ,中国传统文论和西方现代的接受理论在探求文学文本意义上有着两种决然相反的思路 :一是对作者之本意的执着的探求 ,一是对读者在解读文本过程中的主观能动性的张扬 ,这两种理论都有片面性。由此提出了建立当代文学文本解读学的理论构想 :以马克思主义文学理论为指导 ,适当借鉴中国古代文论和西方文论的合理的有价值的成果 ,加以整合 ,从而形成具有较大包容性与科学性的文学文本解读理论 ,即注重历史视野与美学视野的融合
Abstract：This paper gives a comparative study of Acceptance Theory between Ancient Chinese and Modern Western Literature. Through the study, this paper holds the view that Chinese traditional text theory quite differs from the acceptance theory of modern western literature in questing for text meaning. The divergences are in the following two aspects: questing for author's real meaning and publicizing of reader's interpretation, which shows bias. Therefore this paper, guided by Maxist literary theory, accepting the valuable achievements of two different text theories, proposes the construction of theoretical concept of contemporary literature text reading which merges historic view and aesthetic view.
[1]孟子·万章上[Z].
[2]叶燮原诗[Z].
[3]刘勰文心雕龙·时序[Z].
[4]蔡启蔡宽夫诗话[Z].
[5]陈岩肖庚溪诗话(卷上)[Z].
[6]浦起龙读杜新解(卷一之四)[Z].
[7]姚斯.文学史向文学理论的挑战[A].接受美学与接受理论[M].辽宁人民出版社,1987 p.26
[8]姚斯.文学史向文学理论的挑战[A].接受美学与接受理论[M].辽宁人民出版社,1987 p.25
[9]以波特莱尔的诗“烦厌(II)”为例[A].接受美学与接受理论[M].辽宁人民出版社,1987
[10]叶维廉中国诗学[M].三联书店,p.14、p.117.
[11]沃尔夫冈·伊塞尔《阅读活动———审美反应理论》
[12]马克思恩格斯选集(第2卷)[M].p.93—94.
[13]马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].p.561.
[14]王先霈.王又平主编文学批评方法手册[Z]文学批评术语词典[Z].上海文艺出版社
基本信息:
中图分类号:I206.7
引用信息:
[1]殷满堂.历史视野与美学视野的融合——建立当代文学文本解读学的理论构想[J].西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(S4):28-32+347.
2002-12-30
2002-12-30